In most countries，the acceptance and awareness of genetically modified（GM）food have been shaped by divergent messages from environmentalists and biotech industries. For one thing，empirical evidence from biological studies is interpreted in such different ways that one should not expect any convergence of opinions in the near future（e.g.，Royal Society of London，2003）. In the debates about the pros and cons of GM food，we find on one side，concerned biologists，organic farmers，and environmental nongovernmental organizations（NGOs）who have linked up with consumer organizations. They are pitted against agricultural specialists and biotech industry representatives who highlight the benefits of GM crops and food to farmers and consumers（Wansink & Kim，2002）. Over the years，an overwhelming number of empirical studies have been conducted on the public awareness and acceptance of GM food products in various countries.For a good overview，see for instance Hoban（1999）. Another useful review，although not published in a peer-reviewed journal is Kamaldeen and Powell（2000）. Highly complicating a meaningful comparison of these studies are national differences in the adoption rates of GM crops and derived food products，differences in national legislation，as well as differences in survey methodology and the questionnaire design. Regarding the latter，there is often a blurred use of concepts such as consumer“awareness”，“perception”，“attitude”，“knowledge and understanding”，“acceptance”and “education”，on issues of biotechnology. Although China belongs to one of the largest producers and consumers of GM crops and food，there has been relatively little reporting about Chinese consumers，awareness and acceptance in the international literatures.

PeterHo:荷兰格罗宁根大学发展研究中心主任、教授

EduardB.Vermeer: